Food Demystified

It is a paradox today in the year 2010 with all the knowledge accumulated and acquired to note the misdeeds of our society which claims to be protective. Since a public or national agency decided to make itself known, all the media have taken up the subject of diets. The first question is why are we still here when Seneca (1) said "we dig our own grave with our teeth"? Assuming that this is true, why don't we teach the basics of nutrition in school? I say food instead of nutrition, which is said with a pout in order to scientificate the matter and entrust it to scientists: the only ones capable of getting us out of this. If it were true, it would be known. Do they all agree among themselves? Are there no obese people among them? Reading and hearing various proposals here and there, I don't think so. Are wild animals obese even in areas of opulence? Well no! Is it reasonable for journalists who are often unable to put into practice what they propose to give average first-year course instructions for everything? Do not the same journalists live from what causes all the disturbances in our society? In the middle of a program about alcoholism I heard and saw an advertisement for a major brand of aperitif. The advertising that allows these brave journalists to earn quite a lot of money is very often contradictory to the debates that follow or precede these advertisements. Shouldn't these paid whistleblowers conduct a self-examination before opening their antenna? To be basic and to put myself in opposition to many people, here is a very simple proposition. Since many students eat lunch in the canteen, why not serve them balanced menus with an explanation of the menus by a facilitator who talks for a few minutes every day about what our body needs. That the palace lives in our body and that it does not have the same objective as our body, which must nourish all our cells which constitute our whole being. Isn't that the role of national education? Doesn't education also include eating? And then instead of treating, isn't it better to prevent? Isn't prevention in the early stages of life more appropriate and easier than spending crazy amounts of money to lose weight and then being treated from head to toe?

(1) Seneca Roman writer of the 1st century

This is the diet that I recommend during my interventions, it is taken partly from Doctor Seignalet's book, for the other parts from my little experience with contributions taken here and there.

It so happens that I recommend the same diet as several scientific philosophers who have also understood many things...

I also warn that for some people, it is necessary to apply this to the letter for three months and then indulge yourself by eating whatever you want once every 15 days. Having respected our body, it willingly accepts excess. Think of your body as if it were another person who must be respected.

This is part of one of the two conditions to fully benefit from my work.